Comments
Transcript
-
EHEd Harrison here. Just a quick comment since I last interviewed Milton Berg on the platform. I have a twitter thread here on my thoughts regarding this interview https://twitter.com/edwardnh/status/1364579789613502469. I won't repeat everything I wrote there. But the most salient point is that the way I remember Berg from August 2020 is that he was in a quandary because his a lot of data was pointing to bullish outcomes when his gut was telling him that that didn't make complete sense. What you saw here was his data being validated in the last six months and him bringing that fact to bear on the conversation. This was a really good - and fundamental - debate on how far policy makers can and will go and what the consequences will be. It reminds me a lot of what Hugh Hendry was asking Richard Werner last year.
-
JGOne caveat to the observation made by Milton when looking at the returns from the peak around the dotcom bubble in 2000 to 2021 is ignoring clients pulling the plug before 2021............................It took over a decade for some of these companies to get back to break-even. In money management there is a high risk that clients wont stick around for that long while you hold onto such stocks sighting a potential long-term recovery........staying in the game to get you to that 2021 point requires some element of market timing and going to cash
-
GGClearly different approaches to markets and macro frameworks were on display. That said, Hussman was overall cool as a cucumber and able to keep composure better than most would in such an interview, in my opinion. In addition, even if one disagrees in Hussman market calls over time, he has an amazing command to explaining his process and historical valuations. Great video to learn about historical knowledge and gain perspectives on how to stress test your own thought process.
-
JSThank you both. RV needs more conversations where interviewer pushes against interviewee views. That's when thoughtful learning occurs.
-
AWAnyone who tells me that gold has intrinsic value because of industrial use is immediately discredited in my eyes from being able to make a comment about BTC. If you don't understand gold, you have no hope in hell of understanding BTC. It was really disappointing for me to hear that Hussman doesn't know what gold is.
-
DJinterviewer an annoying clown.
-
GTDr. Hussman stated "I've been beating the S&P 500 for 30 years". His longest running fund is Strategic Growth (HSGFX) showing 0.47% annual from inception on 7/24/2000 to 12/31/2020. What am I missing?
-
JSThe interviewer was rudely hostile and seemed to be there solely to prove Dr Hussman wrong. This was the least professional video I’ve seen on this sight after viewing for 2 years. Your staff should really try to make it right with the guest.
-
MMMilton: spx was $24.35 on 1/1/29, $8.69 on 12/31/41, fyi...
-
MMMan, I'm 2/3rds in and I find Milton really tough to endure... the impractical timelines, cherry picking, oof... It's not agreeing or disagreeing, it's style, lack of interest... I love the devil's advocate approach but this too much... Please get Hussman back with, say, Ed Harrison...
-
VHAnother classic case of two dinosaurs pretending to understand Bitcoin... Intellectually lazy, stuck in the 2012 narrative, who (after a trillion dollar free market valuation) think it’s just a “magic internet money”!
-
ATMr. Berg claimed the following: "So you're saying that stocks will decline roughly 4% per annum over the next 10 years, which has never happened in the history of the US stock market. ... you're not going to see 4% decline or 4% per annum, certainly not from 29 to 41, which is 12 years". According to macrotrends.det (https://www.macrotrends.net/2324/sp-500-historical-chart-data) the S&P500 was at 31.71 in Aug, 1929 and 10.3 in Aug, 1941. This is a 67.5 % decline in 12 years and equivalent to a compound annual growth rate of - 8.95 %.
-
JFPlease do more interviews like this. I love seeing the debate between two folks with very different viewpoints. Most engaging video I've seen so far
-
FLI found the argument about "filing an IRS form" for every bitcoin transaction interesting, can some bitcoin expert explain this better: does it mean that if I pay with my tesla in bitcoin i get to pay a capital gains/loss on the $ value of the transaction?
-
NLSo, according to Milton no growth stock is overvalued? I agree with most stuff he says but I can’t agree that most if not all growth stocks are undervalued because in 30, 40 or 700 years they will grow their revenue and justify their current valuations. How can Milton know that, in 2 or 5 years from now, there won’t be a new disruptive tech that can make current mobile phones thing of the past and that tech does not belong to Apple?
-
mkMilton has received alot of flak for his robust interview style.. I actually thought he added alot of value by pushing and stress-testing Johns arguments. Its never about who is right cos we can't know today. The important thing is both gentleman gave me concepts to think about. Thanks enjoyed this!
-
RMDisagree with Berg that stocks don't have a maturity date. That date is when they put me six feet under. At my current age, discounting a stock out 40 years is worthless as I will not be around to enjoy the ROI. You can compare stocks and bonds because an investor may match up a bond maturity to their lifespan/retirement needs and will need to do the same with their stock investments. If I go all in today and market does a 2000 - 2015 run again, boomers will need to liquidate equity principal to pay bills. Using GE as an example again, if you bought at peak of $55 in July, 2000, you are looking at a stock price today of $12.59. So most holders will not live long enough to see that principal recovered. Looking at Oracle with the same starting point of 2000, you didn't get whole until 2016. So if you are a retiree, you are selling off that ORCL stock to pay bills since you are not seeing any appreciation. So chances are today, you are not back to 100% recovery in that initial investment due to liquidating stock at lower prices to pay bills. So while bubbles are difficult to time, for retirees, principal protection and the inability to outlive the recovery of equities from a major downturn are critical factors to consider.
-
mwCovid wasn't anyone's "fault", but it was intentionally drummed up to be the crisis the fed desperately needed. Yes, the virus is real, but the crisis got very exaggerated for a reason. The fed needs reasons to use the bazooka. Another one will be needed soon.
-
NDHow about an RV round table where all the participants come ready to band it out.?? Would be fun and informative
-
RSThe more you pay for a security, the lower the return. Hussman Momentum is still strong - fundamental analysis is irrelevant. Milton This time is not difference - there is always a reversion to the mean. Hussman This time is different- the Fed has made it clear that it is going to back stop the markets at all costs. Milton In the end, I think Milton agrees that stocks are over valued. Neither understands Bitcoin. Hussman's Monthly Commentary is excellent and worth reading.
-
CCThis sounds like an interrogation or questioning at a congressional testimony. Milton seemed either threatened or very annoyed by John's views. Either way, not good for anyone who invested time in this interview. Very unfortunate as it's a bit of a waste of a very solid resource; John Hussman.
-
JGGreat Interview..............Milton is a genius..........would love to see more of him on Real Vision. Does anyone know the type of glasses he wears?
-
SKThe great debate between two professionals, plenty of insights.
-
MAPoor Dr. Hussman. It was more of an interrogation than an interview.
-
APthe problem here was the interviewer, he wanted to discuss and disagree and not to interview...
-
JLGreat views gentleman! Good discussion and John I have followed you and invested with you in the past. Following your allocations are challenging. Recently you recommended ALL cash, do you still?
-
SRMy reaction to the debate seems to be different from other comments. I thought the aggressive debate was awesome and well done.
-
VGWho is the interviewee and who is the interviewer?
-
JGGreat interviewer and interviewee choices. These guys couldn't have a more different philosophy about how to time the market.
-
AMI'll take Dr. Hussman's views (yes, not always 100%) and track record over this guy! Let Dr. Hussman speak! Rude Interviewer. I wish they do just an interview of Dr. Hussman himself.
-
WSGiven the monetary and..fiscal policy ..it seems valuation discussions are superfluous. Still an excellent back and forth...
-
SMfantastic - its great to listen to different point of views.
-
GROpenly speaking, not sure I would call this an interview. Perhaps a spirited and rambling debate would have been a better description. Hussman & Berg would have been better suited as two completely separate appearances conducted by an impartial interviewer. Bias creep and positional defense was rife from both which unfortunately diluted content relative to understanding the framework formation of either side.
-
BKFull disclosure: I am _FAR_ more familiar with John Hussman than Milton Berg. I know the former is brilliant, I'm willing keep an open mind on the latter. Milton Berg is an _AWFUL_ interviewer. His endless interruptions and other unprofessional behavior were unacceptable regardless of the interviewee. Putting it mildly, Milton did not add value to this interview. If there are folks at RV that like Milton, okay, have someone interview him. Using Milton as an interviewer does a disservice to the interviewee, RV members, and Milton himself.
-
PSMilton Berg was way too aggresive! You don´t need to agree, but let the guy tell his story, thats why I came here for
-
DOWhat a fight! LOL... Come on guys.... be more calm at the interview... LOL
-
JPMilton Berg makes some good points about liquidity propping up both bitcoin and stocks. But if we're really at the early stages of Wiemar then you absolutely do not want to own stocks. Infrastructure may to stay ahead, but ultimately it will still be bad for them. Bitcoin, precious metals, and energy are where you want to store wealth.
-
HHIt's unfortunate both speakers talk about Bitcoin without understanding it. They'd better just stay on whatever they are familiar with.
-
API want to see Milton more often on RV. And I would really like his technical indicator session be longer and sole focus of the interview.
-
RMAnd to add, can still remember the late 1990s bubble and a minority including Hussman saying NASDAQ could drop 85%, I said "no way". Maybe back to 3,000 from 5,000, but never to 1,500. Was wrong on that one. And during that decline, Fed rates dropped from 6% to 1%. So to say the Fed "put" can always save investors is misleading. Didn't save them then and can happen again.
-
JFThank you to RV for bringing Hussman on for an interview. I had suggested that RV look into interviewing him a couple of times in the comments over the past year or so and I appreciate that it has come to fruition. Like some other commenters below, I have been reading Hussman's monthly market comment for years now. And I recommend it to any serious investor. I appreciate that Berg was clearly willing to challenge John's ideas in this interview however I do feel that Berg interrupted too often. It also seemed to me that the crux of Berg's argument was "isn't this time different" due to the Federal Reserve? I don't find that convincing, and although I admit that this bull market (bubble) can continue to move up for a while, perhaps years, there will be an eventual reckoning. And to be clear, Berg did seem to admit that we are in a bubble. I agree with Hussman that the overall markets will very likely eventually lose at least 65% from peak to trough once the market psychology actually turns and investors lose confidence in the Federal Reserve's ability to artificially prop up the markets. This time is not different. We have not reached a permanently high plateau. Always have an exit plan because the trap door will open beneath the market's feet eventually.
-
DJ22 minutes in they show a chart from Hussman that implies he has a durable algorithm to pick market tops since 1998. Yet his funds' returns have had absolutely terrible returns for over 10 years. How can anyone take any of his arguments seriously?
-
LHBerg seemed far more interested in forcefully conveying opinions than allowing the audience to consider the thoughtful give and take of competing ideas and discovering actionable information as is customary on the platform. Did not enjoy this at all.
-
DWWho’s interviewing who? Felt sorry for hunts. Quite a blowhard
-
JPSummary. Only God knows what will happen in the future.
-
gjWould really have like to have seen Grant Williams interview Hussman. Alas.
-
CBGreat interview. Much prefer having opposing views battle it out. That said I need to watch this again and take notes.
-
CKHis stated reason for consistently losing money for a decade is that other market participants are "dumb" is all you need to know about this man.
-
SWI thought that this was an excellent interview, despite the occasional interruptions. The depth of perspectives that both John and Milton brought were outstanding - the charts they each showed exceptional!
-
BSExcellent discussion, really enjoyed this one. Thanks for putting it together.
-
DGDidn’t like the constant interference by the interviewer.
-
ABGreat back and forth arguments from both John & Milton! They covered a lot of ground and you certainly don't get this kind of valuable analysis on main stream media outlets, I learned a lot and got some great insights.
-
CBThroughly enjoyed the interview. I would quite like to know post interview if either party had their view/ outlook/ thesis amended based on their counterparts argument.
-
WSslide deck?.
-
RAPitty that Milton Berg does not allow John Hussman to elaborate on this thesis, nor responses. if we are to sit through 90 minutes of conversation, a careful explanation of views is what one wants to get. Challenges to that view, are welcome of course but should be equally carefully developed. I am sure both have excellent reasons, but as an interview, a waste of time. And lamentable that RV would lose such a chance with Hussman.
-
MHThis was an excellent discussion. RV needs more debates during which the interviewer actually challenges the interviewee!
-
SSThat was awesome. Love them both, and loved that they weren't afraid to get into it! More of this please!! Fascinating discussion. More please.
-
BPI'd love to hear more discussion expanding upon Milton's comment about how capital gains taxes impact non-investment transactions in bitcoin and other tokens. Bull or bear, this detail on how the asset is taxed is going to impact how it will be used.
-
NDWhat a fun debate. Milton threw a lot a punches and John countered lol good times!
-
PUThe interviewer did not let John express himself.
-
NDExcellent dialogue and debate between Milton and John, thank you both for your wisdom.
-
HBSo much blabbering and not getting anywhere...
-
TS“If you had held for 25 years...”
-
CJAt the beginning I thought the chemistry between the two would make it a tough listen. As I went along I actually really enjoyed it. They had an Odd Couple thing going. It worked for me and I got a lot out of it.
-
DCFantastic debate between two seasoned market pros. Milton Berg abs John Hussman are both extremely smart and reasoned thinkers. The style of the interview is not the usual RV but it’s well worth spending the time to understand each point of view. The key to making money in a market like this is risk management. Think about which view makes more sense and you will see what risk management style suits you
-
JWVirtual Milton may be a better choice as an interviewer than Milton Berg!!
-
LFIt is nice to hear from guests with different opinions even if they are not my opinions. I think that is more important than ever right now.
-
NCIf you haven't listened to John, do not be dissuaded simply because of the thumbs down. His work is over the course of FULL market cycles and not "sexy." Anyone looking to buy the next SPAC doesn't care, but if you manage a pension fund and haven't read his work then why not? Everyone in between should still read his work, at least once. Plus John is truly one to admire with his humanitarian work in autism and recently Covid.
-
JBImportant to remember the lost decades. Great conversation!
-
LB"Hopefully we both be right."
-
SCJohn's monthly market comments on his site are well worth reading. I've learned a ton from him over the years.
-
MOI have posted this comment few times and I'm gonna have to do it gain. "Earnings don't move the overall market; it's the Federal Reserve Board... focus on the central banks, and focus on the movement of liquidity... most people in the market are looking for earnings and conventional measures. It's liquidity that moves markets." - Stanley Druckenmiller
-
TTNothing better than a passionate debate. Well done, gentlemen.
-
RSMost who buy near the peak are also out by the time market bottom is reached.
-
BAIn one corner: A market practitioner using dcf valuation + sentiment indicators + historically validated models vs In the other corner: A technician using price action and sentiment/ breadth indicators What a great discussion.
-
HFA rigorous interrogation of the value versus growth perspective for equities in the current economic climate by two very credible minds. Very welcome given we are purportedly navigating a fragile financial system which is, we are told, fully invested in a world with no traditional effective hedge (save cash) where globally fiat has to be devalued to deleverage debt as quickly as possible because productivity refuses to grow quickly enough). It’s a shame financial experts don’t get bitcoin in a world that is being forced to build alternative financial structures using new technology to hedge against the inequalities driven by the existing system. Perhaps they are too insulated. Humans are collaborative problem solvers. Betting against bitcoin would be betting against that assumption. The speed of change will be driven by the success (or not) of MMT and fiscal policy but all this new technology has driven the speed of change to date.
-
SRIn essence, passive index-fund-style investing will fail in the long run (John's point) and only an actively monitored portfolio has an option to outperform in the long-term despite significant short- to medium-term drawdowns (Milton's point).
-
SRTerrific discussion. Loved it.
Chapters
-
Hussman's Long-Term Outlook on Stocks
-
The Great Depression and The Federal Reserve
-
Comparing the Future Returns of Stocks and Bonds
-
Bitcoin, Inflation, and the Role of Cash
-
Technical Indicators
-
Is There a Difference Between Investing and Speculation?
-
Why Buying at Market Peaks Can Be Better than Not Buying At All