How The Hell Do You Value Bitcoin?

Published on
December 4th, 2017
37 minutes

How The Hell Do You Value Bitcoin?

The Big Story ·
Featuring Raoul Pal

Published on: December 4th, 2017 • Duration: 37 minutes

Is there any way to make sense of bitcoin’s incredible rally? Raoul Pal asks Paul Brodsky, Chris Burniske, Nick Colas, Peter Brandt and Thomas Lee to lay out their frameworks for valuing bitcoin. With those methods on the table, each expert provides a forecast for what will happen to the bitcoin price over the next year, as does Raoul.


  • MS
    Michael S.
    16 October 2019 @ 07:25
    Imagine the pain when you missed the Central bank equity bubble and invest in the even bigger crypto bubble only to see it burst and you lose all your money
  • AP
    Antonio P.
    14 October 2019 @ 19:50
    The Brodsky stuff is completed stale, making predictions for 2018, give me a break!
  • hj
    henrik j.
    15 May 2018 @ 16:05
    its clear Paul Brodsky dont know a lot about fundamental value of technology in the space own bitcoin cash own ripple no thank you !!!!
  • MP
    Mayank P.
    25 December 2017 @ 16:36
    Raoul's comments in the last couple of minutes sums it up for me.
  • HS
    Hendrik S.
    12 December 2017 @ 11:20
    In my view Bitcoin's characteristics are rather similar to CMGI's (a dotcom incubator during the dotcom boom). Almost unlimited promises. Back of an enveloppe calculations that run into the trillions. POMO (pain of missing out) rather than FOMO keeping millions of people up every night (what if I only bought for USD 5.000....). People buying because its going up. Nassim Taleb is very right that Bitcoin could reach USD 100k before crashing.My own view is we are in the third wave only. But I'm not participating anymore.
  • ii
    ida i.
    11 December 2017 @ 06:50
    this is a balanced explanation of bitcoin I have found it is in 5 parts
  • AP
    Alex P.
    10 December 2017 @ 17:19
    I am so dam tired of all the crypto content .. I think half of RTV content over the last 12 months has been devoted to cryptos. I get it , all the equity bears that missed the equity bull market of the last 10 years looking to redemption in crypto currency.. I also get that blockchain its an interesting technology. I have concluded by now, from all the content barrage, that crypto assets can worth millions or 0.. I am just not sure if there is more point to beat this dead horse.. I don't believe I have learned anything new on cryptos last few dozen videos or publications that I have not learned from the 1st few dozen of videos..
    • CS
      C S.
      12 December 2017 @ 02:36
      I feel you Alex.
    • BT
      Bryan T.
      11 January 2018 @ 16:53
      Yeah, all this silly time spent on one of the most disruptive technologies with huge upside investment potential and certainly the fasting growing asset in history... I'm hoping for updates soon from Trace Mayer and would surely enjoy hearing from Dan Morehead again. Keep the crypto content coming RV.
  • HH
    Heath H.
    8 December 2017 @ 20:44
    Raoul Pal is one of RealVision's 1-on-1 hour long interviewers. It's very disappointing to keep seeing him on these short scattershot Big Story episodes.
  • TK
    Thomas K.
    7 December 2017 @ 17:41
    Great piece Raoul. I invested in bitcoin after your first RVTV piece on it so THANK YOU! I would like to take some of the gains off the table and invest them in the blockchain equity space. A piece discussing the investment options for blockchain equities would be great.
  • AT
    Alex T.
    7 December 2017 @ 11:55
    This video was great until the end, most of what Raoul says is just plain wrong. The claim that forking the bitcoin is "diluting" is like claiming that cutting a one ounce gold coin in half "creates more gold", the claim is so wrong that to make it shows a fundamental misunderstanding of what forking is. As for blockchain without bitcoin, its called a database and companies already have these. Databases with all due respect are not innovative. Finally I don't understand how someone can make these 2 claims with a straight face - "bitcoin is not destined for the heights I first thought" and "I sold out at $2000" (its now $15,000). While, I agree bitcoin will, more than likely, be significantly lower next year - this is a case of getting the right medicine with a totally incorrect diagnosis.
    • TM
      Todd M.
      9 December 2017 @ 00:03
      Agreed..... except XBT on August 1 pre BCH fork is worth $16300 BTC + $1450 BCH + $250 BCG (sum of forks just since then) = $18000! adjusted for the minute of course. A person looking to store value has many choices....Fiat, Gold, Amazon,, Land.... these compete for dollars and rise and fall. Other crypto coins or forks of Bitcoin can compete in the market and that does not in any way diminish Bitcoin. If you hold the coin, you hold all forks. Not sure how Raoul has missed that from the first time he said it when he sold - but missed it he has. The vast majority of commentators have little to no understanding of the technology and say things which just are not true. If everyone understood it - Bitcoin would already be at 100K+, so there is that :)
  • DB
    Douglas B.
    6 December 2017 @ 18:53
    Lyle, those consequences you speak of were definited intended.
    • LK
      Lyle K.
      6 December 2017 @ 23:33
      Wow unbelievable the price action. I am guessing a lot of retail is taking out a loan against the farm right now. The crypto boom is crazy to watch still think the way to play these things as a trade of the price. But good luck getting out when Satoshi unloads.
  • JH
    Jesse H.
    6 December 2017 @ 18:48
    Excellent video - balanced, thoughtful, vintage RV.
  • BS
    Brandon S.
    5 December 2017 @ 22:51
    I booked 400% from Bitcoin. I like the analogy, it's like VC, it could be awesome, or it could go to zero. There is no real substantive argument that can be made for value other than you hope someone pays more for it than you did.
  • SS
    Sam S.
    5 December 2017 @ 20:32
    Just heard Senator Dianne Feinstein is working on a bill to change the legal definition of Bitcoin Miners & Exchanges into financial institutions from financial accounts, thus changing the laws in the name of protection against money laundering and terrorists. Some of you out there in CryptoLand may know more about this. Any updates appreciated. This is what I was referring to in my earlier comment about "what may or what if". All the best.
    • JO
      Johnny O.
      6 December 2017 @ 19:10
      Coinbase, the biggest and abysmal US exchange, has been under attack in various states and lost a case this week requiring them to hand over customer data to the IRS. All the exchanges globally do varying amounts of KYC, but less if you are not depositing fiat currency or the exchange is crypto only. We can expect that US legislation will require the US exchanges to record tax IDs. If they move towards withholding tax and W8 forms, that will be murder for the US exchanges, even though some US states have already declared it's just a form of money and is not securities. But crypto is not dependent on US exchanges or US buyers. Some countries don't even have any capital gains tax to begin with, or are not paranoid about capital flight from their dodgy banks and dodgy fiat currencies, and are not hyping up stories about drugs and money laundering, and some are even welcoming superior crypto exchanges.
  • ii
    ida i.
    5 December 2017 @ 18:21
    I agree with a lot of opinions here, I was looking into buying bitcoin around 18 months ago (to pay for my real vision subscription), but then there were news items about thefts and nobody would explain a year ago the safest channels to purchase and keep bitcoin to avoid thefts..... but what puzzles me now is why do I get so much spam email every morning, with titles like: "buy bitcoin!" from improbable sources, for my experience nobody comes and tries to convince you to get in a good investment by email
  • TM
    The-First-James M.
    5 December 2017 @ 15:02
    I really enjoyed this video and thank you for taking the time to put ut together. Just one question for Raoul. Is there any possibility of getting Chris MacIntosh of Capitalist Exploits in to discuss this topic with you? Chris has talked at length about the Network Effect and Metcalfe's Law. His most recent public blog post is here: There is an oblique reference to Metcalfe's Law in the bottom-most chart.
    • BT
      Bryan T.
      5 December 2017 @ 16:02
      I second that James. MacIntosh is an original thinker and well connected in this space. I've followed him for a number of years and subscribe to his research publication Insider. I got my start in BTC partly based on his thesis last year.
    • TM
      The-First-James M.
      7 December 2017 @ 15:46
      Thanks Jake. I wholeheartedly agree and am also a CapitalistExploits Insider subscriber. I suspect Chris and Raoul have discussed this privately and know these guys all talk to each other.
  • ES
    Edward S.
    5 December 2017 @ 14:20
    Helpful, thanks guys. I had been struggling to think of any bull market of this magnitude and with this much probably only semi-informed backing from small private investors that hadn't subsequently burst horribly. The microsoft when it was private example is interesting. I tend to agree however with Peter B and Raul that this is going to end badly. I hope not too many millenials lose their shirt if/when this fairly clear bubble bursts. This for many could be their first experience of the markets and the sharp end of capitalism. I also hope that such a bad experience of unfettered capitalism doesn't reinforce this sustained wave of socialism (Sanders, Corbyn, Podemos, etc) that has captured the hearts of so many western youngsters.
    • ES
      Edward S.
      5 December 2017 @ 14:22
      Apologies for the typo Raoul
  • TM
    Tony10 M.
    5 December 2017 @ 13:07
    Thoughts Gambling demand for Bitcoin I think that Bitcoin may catch some of the global gambling spend. I have noticed people that I know who like to gamble are VERY keen on bitcoin. They are using bitcoin similar to an online roulette game. This could be a substantial market segment. It would be great to hear from someone who has knowledge of gambling psychology/addiction on Real Vision. The self reinforcing nature of this market seem like the perfect environment to sucker in gamblers. For the record I am still bullish on bitcoin.
  • PN
    Paul N.
    5 December 2017 @ 08:57
    Any cryptocurrency team that markets their coin as being more efficient or being able to handle more transactions than bitcoin needs to understand this: Alipay can do 250000 transactions per second. Thats who you are competing with, not bitcoin. In addition, theres a list a hundred miles long of altcoins that have no fees (because noones using them). Good luck altcoin developers!
  • PN
    Paul N.
    5 December 2017 @ 08:44
    Couple thoughts here: 1. If bitcoin forks are dilutive then so are altcoins. They are basically the same as launching an altcoin except you bribe current bitcoin holders with the initial float, and you try to take the bitcoin brand with you. I dont buy it, the code is not whats scarce its all the parts of the network (infrastructure, users, mining, development talent, etc). 2. Networks are inherently voluntary systems. You run code confirming to its rules or you dont. Nobody can force the total btc amount to change because as long as people still run the original bitcoin its still alive. All youve just made is an altcoin. Whether the market decides its better than the original is a different question. 3. Private ledgers compete with bitcoin about as much as boats compete with airplanes. You can either be centralized, fast, efficient, & censorable or decentralized, slow, & censorship resistant. What ticks me off is pretending that one is the other, as if big VCs marketed boats as wingless airplane technology. Private DLT has nothing to do with Satoshis invention. 4. A fall in bitcoins volatility isnt just a hope. Its volatility has been falling the past 8 years fairly consistently as liquidity and adoption grows.
    • PN
      Paul N.
      5 December 2017 @ 08:49
      I continue to believe we go to 6 digits on grassroots adoption snd bottom up disruption rather than incumbents embracing it - if not this bull run then the next bull run.
    • AT
      Alex T.
      7 December 2017 @ 11:59
      Great to read a post that actually shows an understanding of the topics being discussed.
  • TH
    Timo H.
    5 December 2017 @ 05:51
    I think Raoul himself nailed it the best. A cryptocurrency can have value for two reasons. It may act as a store of value ("digital gold") or it may act as a settlement instrument of a digital transaction. As a store of value its problem is the undisputed fact that a new cryptocurrency can be created (or an existing one hard-forked) at will. Hence, a cryptocurrency is not "digital gold". The different cryptocurrencies are technically roughly equal. Why should I pay 1000000000 dollars for a bitcoin, if there is an unlimited number of other alternatives available? The other reason for a cryptocurrency having value could be its "monopoly" as a settlement instrument in a valuable blockchain. There are two problems here: 1) The transaction rates of the public blockchain systems are generally unacceptable for any widespread use. With a global transaction rate of e.g. 50 txn/sec you can't do much. The public blockchains are yet to demonstrate any real business cases. All the cool stuff happens in the private ledgers. 2) Integrating a fiat currency and a traditional bank payment system as the settlement mechanism for a distributed ledger is a trivial exercise, especially after the banks are forced to open APIs to their payment services. This makes it possible to make a smart contract in the ledger that gets money automatically from your bank account when the conditions of the debit are met in the ledger. So... the cryptocurrency valuations are probably in a huge bubble. However, it may take a while for the general audience to understand this. Until then, enjoy the ride :-)
    • PN
      Paul N.
      5 December 2017 @ 08:05
      i) The value of a coin isnt copying the code its the infrastructure, users, security network, business built on top, etc. Try making and launching it as a competitor to amazon. Itll be worthless even if the code is the same. ii) Transaction rates might be low now but tech moves fast. Just remember how slow the internet was in 1990s iii) So far none of the private ledgers have proven real uses despite billions of dollars of investment. They might later on for sure, but bitcoin has proven its use cases and they havent.
  • TS
    Thomas S.
    5 December 2017 @ 04:52
    I think the potential that Lightning and other sidechains bring to bitcoin (not blockchain) is (potentially) underestimated and misunderstood. Lighting network will be built on top of Bitcoin because of Segwit allows for that. If you want a good perspective on that, Raoul should interview someone from Lightning.
  • LS
    Lance S.
    5 December 2017 @ 03:00
    One wildcard that I don't think was adequately addressed is the probably impact of CME/CBOE stepping in and launching options. The high level of volatility we have seen is inevitable with current limits on the ability to hedge. As I expect we'll start seeing more institutional dollars flowing in will valuation align with demand, utility or ???
  • TM
    Todd M.
    5 December 2017 @ 01:12
    Very well done. The use case for private Blockchains (a bit of a cumbersome database) does not compete with the uses of Bitcoin as a store of value and digital currency. Raoul is overreaching trying to diminish BTC and is missing the point. Derivative technologies are great - and Goldman/JPM can go right on with bills of lading and receipts for your TBills. Bitcoin will not give a hoot about a private blockchain- it will just rock on being Bitcoin. With the global pitfalls identified here on the regular - you should understand a desire to keep secure, uncensorable digital wealth. Quite a bit easier than piles of gold bars..... And oh - what an odd way to misunderstand those forks. Own BTC - own it all. A BTC on July 31, 2017 is worth ~ $11,700 BTC + $1550 BCH + $325 BCG so XBT = 13,575. BTC is the superposition - hold it, hold the forks. Who cares what wins later. On we go! Prediction: Raoul will be back to BTC and welcomed!
    • EF
      Eric F.
      7 December 2017 @ 07:32
      Private blockchains do somewhat undermine Bitcoin, I just don’t see how you can argue otherwise. A lot of the excitement / focus is on blockchain and you don’t need Bitcoin for that. Yes, Bitcoin is easier to store & move than gold, but the latter has some inherent value and other uses. Forks also undermine Bitcoin - it exposes just how immature a proposition this is and undermines the artificial constraints that have been placed on it. How the hell can you trust something if by magic it’s supply is doubled and quadrupled at will? I think Raoul is correct. We might continue to see explosive price action but this has foundations of sand and will crash badly at some point.
    • TM
      Todd M.
      9 December 2017 @ 00:06
      Errata: My price example for XBT is now $18000 - time flies in 3 days :)
  • SR
    Steve R.
    4 December 2017 @ 22:44
    Not really very surprising....
  • AG
    Amir G.
    4 December 2017 @ 21:37
    I have read/listened to/watched various articles/podcasts/videos on cryptocurrencies and this one wasn’t particularly any different than the rest. This video as Raoul Pal introduced in the beginning was supposed to be about understanding the underlying fundamentals of Bitcoins, yet none of the guests really explained that and all discussions and comments were more about forward speculations and how it’s going to evolve in the future, which left me with more questions and even more confused as before. As for Peter Brandt whom I have a lot of respect for and read is unique book on trading, he doesn’t not necessarily understand it and only ‘Trades’ it based technical charts, so I guess it’s okay to be in it for a short term “trade” to potentially gain 20-30% at these levels, but for a long term “investment” it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. The last 3 minutes with Raoul Pal made the most sense to me especially on the volatility aspect. That is to say if volatility keeps exploding as it has so far, how can this possibly replace Fiat currency? It would be a total chaos. Do you want your house to be worth a million dollars today and the very next day only $800K?! And if the volatility were to implode then what is the point of investing in this!
    • SP
      Steve P.
      4 December 2017 @ 23:08
      Amir You have picked up on the underlying theme of crypto being that nobody really understands its' value nor its' ultimate place in the financial system (if it indeed has one). 'Raised more questions than answered' is the perfect way to describe any current debate in the crypto currency space. This informative video proved that.
    • PN
      Paul N.
      5 December 2017 @ 08:07
      The volatility of bitcoin has been going down for the last 8 years not up. In order to be stable it needs to go up alot first...
  • SS
    Sam S.
    4 December 2017 @ 21:21
    If the "hard fork" had taken place, where would be price of Bitcoin be today? The same bull bear tug-of-war publications caused my thinking to pause and I likewise sold in the $2000 per coin range. Great profit but not the smart move. The smart move, in my humble never perfect opinion, "only buy or sell when the FACTS change". I sold because of the "maybe's and the assumptions" of where was going or could be going, but not the facts. Assumptions can be the mother of all F****up's.
  • JM
    JP M.
    4 December 2017 @ 21:12
    Interesting set of views. My 2cents: a) Everything requiring trust will flow to THE blockchain - as all information flows to the Internet. b) Additional layers to be built upon THE blockchain (smart contracts RSK, Lightning, etc) - increasing functionality of the trust generating machine c) Unexpected, emerging properties of The blockchain will become apparent and change economies. Wait 10 years. d) Currency is the killer app for THE blockchain - good money chases out bad money e) Disrupted industries: banking, payment networks, insurance, custody, notaries, auditors, etc. Valuation = f(c+d+e) THE blockchain = for now its Bitcoin
    • VS
      Vikram S.
      4 December 2017 @ 22:46
      Exactly. Bitcoin is the blockchain. There will be many software upgrades to Bitcoin but is by far the only significant blockchain and the price reflects this.
    • EF
      Eric F.
      7 December 2017 @ 07:36
      The problem is Bitcoin is not THE blockchain. Name one major company embracing Bitcoin for it’s blockchain? Yet massive investment by many huge companies are going into private blockchains.
  • VS
    Vikram S.
    4 December 2017 @ 20:58
    Bitcoin is the most secure and most decentralised blockchain by a long way (as any software developer will explain). Rick Fakvigne predicts Bitcoin will take up 5% of the FX market and will be valued over $3million. It is still early days for Bitcoin. Invest a small amount and hold for the long term.
  • SR
    Steve R.
    4 December 2017 @ 20:57
    Great piece Raoul! And yes, I do pretty much agree with your conclusion - blockchain is the future/technology, not bitcoin. Having been in the tech space for over 30 years I've seen all this before, albeit on a much smaller scale, with other technologies. With bitcoin, because it's money, you now have so many vested interests in keeping the price high, it almost smacks of a 'scam'. The constant stream of crap on CNBC and the FOMO mantra spouted everywhere tells me all you need to know. I also find it quite ironic that all the crypto-maniacs on twitter claiming the price will 'go to the moon' own such small amounts of bitcoin it's not going to be 'life changing' even if the price does double or triple again. So what does this tell me? It tells me they are just following the CNBC/FOMO matra to move the price higher to sell on to the next fool. It provides the liquidity for the big holders to exit at the expense of the latecomers. Sound familiar? These days, particularly the millennial snowflakes, just so believe in the 'something for nothing' mantra, it's such an easy story to sell - but seriously, this just ain't gonna end well! You also didn't touch on global regulation, which is tightening all the time, from yesterday's Guardian: I was surprised at how many 'experts' view bitcoin as a store of value - to me it's anything but. By its very nature, anything that can be materially changed cannot be a store of value. Just look at how technology has advanced over just the last decade. Technologies come and go all the time. But, hey ho, these are just MY opinions, each to their own, good luck if you hold.
    • EF
      Eric F.
      7 December 2017 @ 07:39
      Who the hell is voting these comments down? The bloody Bitcoin apologists. There is such a lack of objectivity from these guys, and that is going to set them up for a very hard landing.
  • MC
    Minum C.
    4 December 2017 @ 20:25
    I wonder how expensive put and call premiums will be and if a properly implemented options strategy might be the best way to manufacture a profit in Bitcoin going forward?
  • TP
    Tom P.
    4 December 2017 @ 20:19
    Did no one think to look at the expected cost to mine a bitcoin? Surely that is the fair value. Assuming fixed hash rates + fixed electricity prices: (yearly mining farm hardware cost + yearly mining farm electricity bill) / expected number of mined bitcoin per year The fact it's WAAAAY cheaper to mine a bitcoin than it is to buy a bitcoin is something that shouldn't be ignored.
    • PN
      Paul N.
      5 December 2017 @ 08:09
      I disagree with mining cost based models for valuing bitcoin. Because if bitcoin falls in price the network difficulty also falls, so mining becomes easier. This is a tail wagging the dog argument.
    • TP
      Tom P.
      5 December 2017 @ 11:33
      How much does it cost to mine a bitcoin? That's its fair value.
  • AS
    Andrew S.
    4 December 2017 @ 19:51
    Nobody know exactly how this plays out but IMO if you have any wealth to protect, you would be crazy not to own some Bitcoin and some gold.
  • TS
    Tor S.
    4 December 2017 @ 19:27
    Great stuff! I liked this one :) I allso like you Raoul but i think you are a litle to bearish this time. I’d say its a bold move to enter 2018 with 0% crypto exposure, given all the facts. You need to be a «hodler» again Raoul! :)
  • HJ
    Harry J.
    4 December 2017 @ 17:19
    If i can’t be relatively sure of value before i put up real money it’s just a roll of the dice! I’ll go to vegas first more predictable And fun! Good luck I always like to see sucess happen. Good LUCK
    • DB
      David B.
      4 December 2017 @ 18:48
      The pay off of being right in crypto is way more asymmetric than a roll of the dice making crypto far more attractive.
  • LK
    Lyle K.
    4 December 2017 @ 17:15
    Interesting thought if cryptos start to take market share from fiat, makes sense because of the tradability and portability and speed of them. I wonder if the government will start cracking down on this because in a sense it is counterfeiting it is producing excess money and I wonder if cryptos will cause hyperinflation because of the extra money that is created out of thin air. Seems to me their might be some unintended consequences of this new asset class.
  • DB
    David B.
    4 December 2017 @ 16:12
    Raoul, You are awesome...really awesome! Be careful about equating chain forks with dilution. It is simply a share split but shares that have slightly different characteristics. But the most important thing is that a holder of one bitcoin is NOT diluted in any way. That holder (HODLER) continues to own the same share of the combined (forked) networks. There could 100 forks and the holder owns the same share of all forked chains. There is truly no dilution. Now many of the forked chains may ultimately become worthless, but it does not matter because holding the original bitcoin ensures that you own whatever chain, or chains, ultimately win.
    • JH
      Joe H.
      4 December 2017 @ 21:24
      Good point. More like a spin-off than dilution.
    • ZD
      Zachary D.
      5 December 2017 @ 00:50
      Is that correct? Is that only the case with a soft fork? Is that applicable to a hard fork? Invest With The Best had a good podcast on it, thought this was only the case with soft forks...
    • TE
      Tito E.
      5 December 2017 @ 10:56
      This is the main point i've not understood so far.Soft-fork means same number of bitcoin (just software update), but hardfork is new issuance. So if there are 21 million bitcoin_1 and i own one, then there's a hard-fork: I've read that there are 21 million new bitcoin_2 (another blockchain) produced. So i now own one bitcoin_1 and one bitcoin_2? I did own one bitcoin and i now own two?
    • DB
      David B.
      5 December 2017 @ 19:58
      That's right, Tito. If Bitcoin hard forks into Bitcoin and BitcoinGold and BitcoinCash (which it did), as an owner of the original Bitcoin, you now own ALL THREE. Pretty sweet, huh? Thus, there is no real dilution. Your share of the total bitcoin pie remains unchanged. That stands in stark contrast to the issuance of (or printing) of currency by governments. If you own a $100 bill and the government doubles the amount of outstanding currency in circulation, you still only have $100...which can likely only purchase half of what it used to be able to purchase before they printed!
    • KE
      Kathryn E.
      6 December 2017 @ 20:28
      I believe that is the point that Raoul is trying to make. How is it possible that new currencies can be created from one where everyone just duplicates their money (by having 1 off original coin 1 and 1 off original coin 2) with no real consequence.
    • EF
      Eric F.
      7 December 2017 @ 07:44
      How the hell is there no dilution? You explanation only holds water if you were holder at point of split? I buy Bitcoin now and I don’t get anything from previous forks.
    • DP
      David P.
      8 December 2017 @ 06:02
      David, i would tend to disagree. Why is Google, Facebook or Amazon value growing beyond belief? Because they have a monopoly over a significant part of the market, even if you have a bit of competition/conquest at the fringes (funded by the monopoly itself). If Bitcoin forks too much, it may create its own competitors in the "store of value" market and most of its value is based on the fact that there is a near certainty (currently) that it is the best crypto for wealth storage purpose. If there is 5 different cryptos for the same application, their combined value will become lower than for a monopolistic currency as they will become perceived speculative.
  • bf
    bart f.
    4 December 2017 @ 15:51
    I fully sympathize with Raoul’s negative view: volatility vs store of value, forks, no monopoly on block chain, higher price = more incentive for OTC initiative, no decentralization with miners pooling and concentrating. However adoption rate is low and financial institutions (who are losing the monopoly on money) will custody and start trading it. Individuals can owe privately any size (which is not possible with stocks). So I am wary about leaving that train too early. Now I agree that it might not be the final underlying to play the blockchain disruption (same way dotcom stocks were not a good play on internet).
  • RM
    Richard M.
    4 December 2017 @ 15:48
    Very informative! I've been trying to wrap my head around this whole crypto/blockchain world and this helped a lot. Thanks.
  • CL
    Cameron L.
    4 December 2017 @ 12:00
    Great Stuff, but guys can you please run log charts for future image overlays... linear charts are just ridiculous in crypto space, very difficult to ascertain anything from them at all, will take your analyst half a second extra to change settings in excel.
    • CL
      Cameron L.
      4 December 2017 @ 12:09
      spoke too soon, 2nd chart was log.. cheers guys